From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>, eparis@parisplace.org
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>, linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: convert status version to a feature bitmap
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:23:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13752367.yccC5JN0ln@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3782801.lIH1fB4Omg@sifl>
On Monday, November 17, 2014 11:09:08 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Friday, November 14, 2014 10:32:51 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 14/11/13, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 13, 2014 08:08:52 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > The audit 2.4.1 package has been pushed to everything from F20 ->
> > > rawhide.
> > > If you don't see any problems, then its safe. But check carefully around
> > > the things that you did change. Right now, we only are caring about only
> > > one kernel feature, --loginuid-immutable. Check that it still works,
> > > auditctl -s.
> >
> > Here's my output, which I assume looks sane:
Yeah, but how do we know its really selecting the right feature?
> > [root@f20 ~]# rpm -q audit
> > audit-2.4.1-1.fc20.x86_64
> > [root@f20 ~]# auditctl -s
> > enabled 1
> > flag 1
> > pid 307
> > rate_limit 0
> > backlog_limit 320
> > lost 0
> > backlog 0
> > backlog_wait_time 60000
> > loginuid_immutable 0 unlocked
>
> Looks like good output to me, Steve?
I would like it better if the following was tested as root:
auditctl -s
echo "1" > /proc/self/loginuid
auditctl --loginuid-immutable
auditctl -s
echo "2" > /proc/self/loginuid
This was we know that the feature is correctly reported, selected, and
working.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-17 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-13 20:29 [PATCH] audit: convert status version to a feature bitmap Richard Guy Briggs
2014-11-13 20:38 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-13 22:00 ` Paul Moore
2014-11-14 1:01 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-11-13 22:12 ` Paul Moore
2014-11-14 1:08 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-11-14 2:51 ` Steve Grubb
2014-11-15 3:32 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-11-17 16:09 ` Paul Moore
2014-11-17 17:23 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2014-11-17 18:08 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-11-17 18:11 ` Steve Grubb
2014-11-17 18:16 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-11-17 19:48 ` Paul Moore
2014-11-17 20:51 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-11-17 21:59 ` Paul Moore
2014-11-14 13:32 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13752367.yccC5JN0ln@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox