public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:12:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382713941.2954.19.camel@flatline.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5269CB06.5060101@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:36 +0900, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:

> systemd                                    |auditd
> -------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
> ...                                        |
> -> audit_receive                           |...
>    -> mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex)         |-> audit_receive
>       ... -> audit_log_start               |   -> mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex)
>              -> wait_for_auditd            |      // wait for systemd
>                 -> schedule_timeout(60*HZ) |

Ugggh, definitely a problem.  Adding a similar hack to systemd really
does not seem like an acceptable answer.  It seems to me that in
audit_receive_msg()

case AUDIT_USER:
case AUDIT_FIRST_USER_MSG ... AUDIT_LAST_USER_MSG:
case AUDIT_FIRST_USER_MSG2 ... AUDIT_LAST_USER_MSG2:

we do not need to hold the audit_cmd_mutex.  So a quick and dirty patch
should be to just drop the mutex there (and we need to verify there
aren't issues running the audit_filter_user() without the lock).  That
will take care of systemd and anything USING audit.  It still means that
you could race with something configuring audit and auditd shutting
down.  Seems like a good quick and dirty 'fix' while we work on a better
fix...

To take care of that I think maybe we could drop the cmd_mutex every
time we call audit_log_start.  That's not necessarily going to be
pretty.  Maybe make a new switch at the top of the function which knows
which operations we are going to have to allocate an audit_buffer.  Drop
the lock, allocate the buffer, then retake the lock to finish running
audit_receive_msg()....

Maybe that second option isn't so hard and we can go directly after that
instead of just dealing with userspace audit messages?

Thoughts?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-25 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-11  1:36 [BUG][PATCH][RFC] audit: hang up in audit_log_start executed on auditd Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-10-11  9:33 ` Gao feng
     [not found]   ` <5257EF15.6080209@jp.fujitsu.com>
     [not found]     ` <20131015134345.98d72df42a39e9e1ad77a73c@jp.fujitsu.com>
     [not found]       ` <525CE10A.90907@cn.fujitsu.com>
2013-10-23 19:55         ` [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop Richard Guy Briggs
2013-10-24  5:55           ` Gao feng
2013-10-24 19:35             ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-10-25  1:36           ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-10-25 15:12             ` Eric Paris [this message]
2013-10-28  9:20               ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-12-05  2:45               ` [PATCH 0/3] audit: remove audit_log_start() contention in AUDIT_USER type calls Richard Guy Briggs
2013-12-05  2:45                 ` [PATCH 1/3] selinux: call WARN_ONCE() instead of calling audit_log_start() Richard Guy Briggs
2013-12-05  2:45                 ` [PATCH 2/3] smack: " Richard Guy Briggs
2013-12-06 18:40                   ` Casey Schaufler
2013-12-08 22:17                     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-12-05  2:45                 ` [PATCH 3/3] audit: drop audit_cmd_lock in AUDIT_USER family of cases Richard Guy Briggs
2013-12-09  2:31                   ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-12-05  7:15                 ` [RESEND][BUG][PATCH V3] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop Toshiyuki Okajima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1382713941.2954.19.camel@flatline.rdu.redhat.com \
    --to=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox