From: Imre Palik <imrep.amz@gmail.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Palik, Imre" <imrep@amazon.de>,
Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3] audit: move the tree pruning to a dedicated thread
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:27:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421324870-15070-1-git-send-email-imrep.amz@gmail.com> (raw)
From: "Palik, Imre" <imrep@amazon.de>
When file auditing is enabled, during a low memory situation, a memory
allocation with __GFP_FS can lead to pruning the inode cache. Which can,
in turn lead to audit_tree_freeing_mark() being called. This can call
audit_schedule_prune(), that tries to fork a pruning thread, and
waits until the thread is created. But forking needs memory, and the
memory allocations there are done with __GFP_FS.
So we are waiting merrily for some __GFP_FS memory allocations to complete,
while holding some filesystem locks. This can take a while ...
This patch creates a single thread for pruning the tree from
audit_add_tree_rule(), and thus avoids the deadlock that the on-demand
thread creation can cause.
Reported-by: Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>
Cc: Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Palik <imrep@amazon.de>
---
kernel/audit_tree.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
index 2e0c974..4883b6e 100644
--- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
+++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct audit_chunk {
static LIST_HEAD(tree_list);
static LIST_HEAD(prune_list);
+static struct task_struct *prune_thread;
/*
* One struct chunk is attached to each inode of interest.
@@ -651,6 +652,55 @@ static int tag_mount(struct vfsmount *mnt, void *arg)
return tag_chunk(mnt->mnt_root->d_inode, arg);
}
+/*
+ * That gets run when evict_chunk() ends up needing to kill audit_tree.
+ * Runs from a separate thread.
+ */
+static int prune_tree_thread(void *unused)
+{
+ for (;;) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (list_empty(&prune_list))
+ schedule();
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
+ mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
+
+ while (!list_empty(&prune_list)) {
+ struct audit_tree *victim;
+
+ victim = list_entry(prune_list.next,
+ struct audit_tree, list);
+ list_del_init(&victim->list);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
+
+ prune_one(victim);
+
+ mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&audit_cmd_mutex);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int launch_prune_thread(void)
+{
+ prune_thread = kthread_create(prune_tree_thread, NULL,
+ "audit_prune_tree");
+ if (IS_ERR(prune_thread)) {
+ pr_err("cannot start thread audit_prune_tree");
+ prune_thread = NULL;
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ } else {
+ wake_up_process(prune_thread);
+ return 0;
+ }
+}
+
/* called with audit_filter_mutex */
int audit_add_tree_rule(struct audit_krule *rule)
{
@@ -674,6 +724,12 @@ int audit_add_tree_rule(struct audit_krule *rule)
/* do not set rule->tree yet */
mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
+ if (unlikely(!prune_thread)) {
+ err = launch_prune_thread();
+ if (err)
+ goto Err;
+ }
+
err = kern_path(tree->pathname, 0, &path);
if (err)
goto Err;
@@ -811,36 +867,10 @@ int audit_tag_tree(char *old, char *new)
return failed;
}
-/*
- * That gets run when evict_chunk() ends up needing to kill audit_tree.
- * Runs from a separate thread.
- */
-static int prune_tree_thread(void *unused)
-{
- mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex);
- mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
-
- while (!list_empty(&prune_list)) {
- struct audit_tree *victim;
-
- victim = list_entry(prune_list.next, struct audit_tree, list);
- list_del_init(&victim->list);
-
- mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
-
- prune_one(victim);
-
- mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
- }
-
- mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&audit_cmd_mutex);
- return 0;
-}
static void audit_schedule_prune(void)
{
- kthread_run(prune_tree_thread, NULL, "audit_prune_tree");
+ wake_up_process(prune_thread);
}
/*
@@ -907,9 +937,9 @@ static void evict_chunk(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
for (n = 0; n < chunk->count; n++)
list_del_init(&chunk->owners[n].list);
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
if (need_prune)
audit_schedule_prune();
- mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
}
static int audit_tree_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
--
1.7.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-15 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-15 12:27 Imre Palik [this message]
2015-01-28 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3] audit: move the tree pruning to a dedicated thread Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421324870-15070-1-git-send-email-imrep.amz@gmail.com \
--to=imrep.amz@gmail.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=imrep@amazon.de \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msw@amazon.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox