From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: How to audit socket close system call?
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:37:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466007.JfWioEVIc5@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC6KHBem2dx1ep+Xo_zPHuBe_w0pD6z76KndAv7kfbMttyeGDQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, December 19, 2014 02:06:52 PM Jie Cui wrote:
> How to audit socket close system call?
There's not a good answer on that one.
> I can audit the socket connection by 'connect' system call.
> I can also audit the socket termination by 'shutdown' system call.
> But I can't figure out how to audit when the socket is closed.
In the past, the kernel developers said that is an exercise left to post
processing in user space. Meaning that we'd have to collect everything and
then sort it out after the fact. You have the FD returned from socket(2). So,
you can audit closes and then match the FD.
Unfortunately, you'll get all closes for all programs unless you had some way
to restrict it to the process in question. There is a patch under development
for audit by process name. That would at least have allowed restricting closes
to a particular program which would be more manageable.
> Does the 'close' system call works?
Yes.
> However all the file close events will also be auditing. That's not what I
> want.
I can understand. But, there is nothing in the present kernel except pid,
auid, and subj_type to restrict the auditing in a logical way. If you can
think of another way, please propose it. But all the kernel has to work with
is an fd number and what's in the process struct. Audit by process name holds
the most hope for limiting what gets collected.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-19 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-19 6:06 How to audit socket close system call? Jie Cui
2014-12-19 14:37 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2014-12-20 19:39 ` Hassan Sultan
2014-12-21 16:04 ` Steve Grubb
2015-01-08 22:55 ` Alexander Viro
2015-01-09 18:22 ` LC Bruzenak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466007.JfWioEVIc5@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox