From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: don't attempt to lookup PIDs when changing PID filtering audit rules Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:15:16 -0500 Message-ID: <16312766.Oe1UCGEpHS@sifl> References: <20141215171414.30169.46068.stgit@localhost> <20141215185057.GA6439@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <1418669512.3145.4.camel@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1418669512.3145.4.camel@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Eric Paris Cc: Richard Guy Briggs , linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Monday, December 15, 2014 01:51:52 PM Eric Paris wrote: > On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 13:50 -0500, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > On 14/12/15, Eric Paris wrote: > > > Lets say I and in the non-init pid namespace. > > > > > > I run audictl -a exit,always -S all -F pid=1 > > > > That's easy (for now). Line 675 of kernel/audit.c in audit_netlink_ok() > > > > called from audit_receive_msg() will prevent that with: > > if ((task_active_pid_ns(current) != &init_pid_ns)) > > > > return -EPERM; > > > > > Is the audit system going to show records for what I think is pid=1 or > > > what the initial pid namespace thinks is pid=1 ? > > ACK from me then. Okay, thanks. Anybody else want to jump on the Ack/Review bandwagon? -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat