public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: configuration for busy docker host
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:48:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1898518.JS7Fg7ejBs@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28615add-906a-b86a-2d02-db5ae33898d9@genkgo.nl>

On Monday, August 20, 2018 5:56:04 AM EDT Frederik Bosch wrote:
> As I have not found a location anywhere else on the web, I am sending my
> question to this list. I have an Ubuntu 18.04 machine with auditd and it
> acts as a Docker Host machine. I have hardened the system via this
> package: https://github.com/konstruktoid/hardening which installs auditd
> with the configuration to be found here:
> https://github.com/konstruktoid/hardening/blob/master/misc/audit.rules.

These rules could be improved upon by condensing:

# File deletions
# Capture all unauthorized file accesses
# Capture all failures to access on critical elements
# Permissions

down to 2 rules in each, 4 for the second one. That, however, is not the 
actual problem. My guess is that it is capturing way more information than is 
necessary.

> The problems I have are related to the directives -f and -b. The
> hardening package uses -b 8192 and -f 2. That results in a kernel panic
> very quickly because of audit backlog limit exceeded, and that causes a
> reboot of the system. Now I wonder what a good configuration would be. I
> started reading on the subject and read that -f 2 is probably the best
> for security reasons. However, I do not want to have a system that
> panics very quickly and reboots.

I'd say that you need to run:

aureport --start today --key --summary

and see what rule is triggering all the events. Do you really want all 
deletes? Or just deletes in a specific directory? Do you really want to know 
that a user changed dir permissions on a file in their homedir?

> Should I simply increase the backlog to much higher numbers? Or should I
> change -f to not cause a kernel panic? Or am I missing something and
> should I change some other configuration? Thanks for your help.

For the moment change -f not to cause a kernel panic. I think the rules are 
probably too aggressive.

-Steve

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-20 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-20  9:56 configuration for busy docker host Frederik Bosch
2018-08-20 14:10 ` Frederik Bosch
2018-08-20 17:48 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2018-08-22 11:40   ` Frederik Bosch
2018-08-22 12:42     ` Steve Grubb
2018-08-22 14:49       ` Frederik Bosch
2018-08-23 14:18         ` Steve Grubb
2018-08-23 16:01           ` Frederik Bosch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1898518.JS7Fg7ejBs@x2 \
    --to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox