From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: auditing kdbus service names
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:48:10 -0400
Message-ID: <1988863.rx1nHfWkfd@sifl>
References: <3754565.WlII3JJvve@sifl> <18456537.MDqL7RWdSn@x2>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <18456537.MDqL7RWdSn@x2>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Osmialowski <p.osmialowsk@samsung.com>, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 05:38:14 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 08:40:34 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > I'm currently working on a set of LSM hooks for the new kdbus IPC
> > mechanism
> > and one of the things that I believe we will need to add is a new audit
> > field for the kdbus service name (very similar to the old fashioned dbus
> > service name).  I was thinking "kdbus_svc" for the field name, any
> > objections?
> 
> What was used on the old dbus events?

The very generic "service" field name, see the "acquire_svc" example in the 
URL below.  I believe there is some value in picking a new field name since 1) 
the field name is too generic in my opinion and 2) kdbus != dbus.

 * http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2004-November/001728.html

-- 
paul moore
security @ redhat