From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak122 v1] audit: store event sockaddr in case of no rules
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:28:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199a98fc-93ee-53fa-a5aa-4d79d26d1a91@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhQUiqkeygtEWAa=j8Dxysh_jSWhf33CYo7i2Tij26FH2w@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/13/2020 5:11 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 7:09 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>> ... but it does appear that I could switch to using your audit_alloc_local().
> In my opinion, linking the audit container ID and LSM stacking
> patchsets would seem like a very big mistake, especially since the
> consolidation you are describing could be done after the fact without
> any disruption to the kernel/userspace interface. I would strongly
> encourage both patchsets to remain self-contained if at all possible
> so as to not jeopardize each other.
Whatever helps the review/ack process best works for me. I will leave
audit_stamp_context() as is unless there is other feedback that leads
it to be changed.
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-14 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-03 17:17 [PATCH ghak122 v1] audit: store event sockaddr in case of no rules Richard Guy Briggs
2020-07-08 22:49 ` Paul Moore
2020-07-13 17:40 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2020-07-13 17:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-13 20:02 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2020-07-13 23:08 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-14 0:11 ` Paul Moore
2020-07-14 0:28 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2020-07-14 0:47 ` Paul Moore
2020-07-14 1:08 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2020-07-14 1:19 ` Paul Moore
2020-07-14 2:37 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-13 22:30 ` Paul Moore
2020-07-13 22:37 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199a98fc-93ee-53fa-a5aa-4d79d26d1a91@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox