From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rework of IPC auditing
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:24:44 -0500
Message-ID: <200603311424.44064.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1142018719.13416.91.camel@kirkland1.austin.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1142018719.13416.91.camel@kirkland1.austin.ibm.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com, dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Friday 10 March 2006 14:25, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> 2) Support for an AUDIT_IPC_NEW_PERM audit message type. =C2=A0This all=
ows
> for separate auxiliary audit records for normal operations on an IPC
> object and permissions changes. =C2=A0Note that the same struct
> audit_aux_data_ipcctl is used and populated, however there are separate
> audit_log_format statements based on the type of the message.

Can we have another name for this record type? I don't want us to get in =
the=20
habit of adding "new" to the record type name. Is there something that be=
tter=20
describes its purpose?

-Steve