From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:37:16 -0700
Message-ID: <20060405153716.6f71939f.akpm@osdl.org>
References: <296FAFD9-3D3E-421C-A474-1998BCB8F718@mac.com>
	<200604052004.k35K4u56010157@wildsau.enemy.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	k35McOP6002855
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:38:24 -0400
Received: from smtp.osdl.org (smtp.osdl.org [65.172.181.4])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k35McMk4012776
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:38:22 -0400
Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6])
	by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k35McGtH018785
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:38:17 -0700
Received: from bix (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31])
	by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with SMTP id k35McHxa022519
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:38:17 -0700
In-Reply-To: <200604052004.k35K4u56010157@wildsau.enemy.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Herbert Rosmanith <kernel@wildsau.enemy.org> wrote:
>
> (2) in linux/Documentation/devices.txt I've found an "audit device":
> 
>          103 block       Audit device
>                            0 = /dev/audit        Audit device
> 

hm.  I don't think that's true, is it?  If not, can we clean
it up please?