From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Watch Performance
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 06:26:26 -0400
Message-ID: <200604110626.26843.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <200604081221.58080.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<20060411035138.GD656@sage.flatmonk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060411035138.GD656@sage.flatmonk>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Amy Griffis <amy.griffis@hp.com>
Cc: redhat-lspp@redhat.com, linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Monday 10 April 2006 23:51, Amy Griffis wrote:
> 1) what audit rules did you use?

I used the lspp rules to get the 1st 10, and the rest were against files 
in /etc/test.

> 2) what system call(s) did you measure?

access("/usr/include", 0);

The watch rules were never triggered because I wanted to measure the overhead 
where no audit events occur. The syscall exercises the file system without 
doing any IO, which would complicate things, too.

-Steve