public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: redhat-lspp@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Watch Performance
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:01:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604111701.23649.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060411161141.GA16506@zk3.dec.com>

On Tuesday 11 April 2006 12:11, Amy Griffis wrote:
> -a exit,always -S chmod -S fchmod -S chown -S fchown -S lchown
> -S creat -S open -S truncate -S ftruncate -S mkdir -S rmdir -S unlink
> -S rename -S link -S symlink -F watch=/etc/sysconfig/console
>
> Now you don't have any rules for access(), so using it as the test
> case is much more interesting.

OK, I re-worked auditctl to use these syscalls instead of "all". I then re-ran 
the tests on the same kernel as I was testing on since lspp.17 has slab debug 
stuff turned on again.

rules  seconds    loss
0        50            0%
10      52            4%
25      56            12%
50      69            38%
75      81            62%
90      87            74%

The 75 rule performance hit is now 62%. So there is some improvement in 
performance. RHEL4 has a 6% hit for 90 rules. We've narrowed the difference, 
but I don't consider this solved.

I also don't like the idea of handling this by all those syscalls or using 
"all" because user space tools could get out of sync with the kernel. On any 
kernel upgrade, there could be a new syscall that allows file system access. 
The user space tools wouldn't know about it and wouldn't provide automatic 
coverage.

-Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-11 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-08 16:21 Watch Performance Steve Grubb
2006-04-09 19:48 ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-11 13:12   ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-11  3:51 ` Amy Griffis
2006-04-11 10:26   ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-11 16:11     ` Amy Griffis
2006-04-11 21:01       ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2006-04-11 21:21         ` Linda Knippers
2006-04-12 21:15         ` Amy Griffis
2006-04-17 15:27           ` Timothy R. Chavez
2006-04-17 20:06             ` Klaus Weidner
2006-04-21 15:01               ` Amy Griffis
2006-04-21 15:13                 ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-21 15:10                   ` Linda Knippers
2006-04-21 16:07                     ` Alexander Viro
2006-04-24 15:34                       ` Amy Griffis
2006-05-10 15:32         ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-10 16:34           ` Alexander Viro
2006-05-10 19:23             ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-10 19:37               ` Alexander Viro
2006-05-10 19:51                 ` Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200604111701.23649.sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=redhat-lspp@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox