From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with audit
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:07:03 -0400
Message-ID: <200604210707.03700.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <444813FD.9060507@us.ibm.com>
	<200604201912.40649.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<444818BC.3060807@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <444818BC.3060807@us.ibm.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Loulwa Salem <loulwas@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Thursday 20 April 2006 19:26, Loulwa Salem wrote:
> > How does lspp.18 do? It seems more stable to me than lspp.17. Also, what
> > SE Linux policy do you have loaded ?
>
> I am running SELinux in permissive mode.

Hmm. What SE Linux policy are you running? (name & version)

Thanks,
-Steve