Re: [PATCH] execve argument logging

Alexander Viro
2006-04-21T20:22:35Z

On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 04:19:09PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> Maybe a "first 32/64 bytes of each argument" limit is needed? Or is there one
> there and I missed it?

You do realize that it makes e.g. any pathname arguments in effect not
logged at all - just slap 64 '/' in front of absolute pathname and you
are done.