From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] kernel/audit.c: remove unused exports
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:12:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060421181243.GH19754@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060421172410.GB32038@suse.de>
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:24:10AM -0700, Tony Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 11:27:55AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_start);
> > > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_end);
> > > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_format);
> > > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log);
> > >
> > > It would seem useful to allow out of tree modules (even if they never have
> > > a goal of submitting to become intree) to log audit data. No? A reason to
> > > prevent it seems utterly lost on me.
> >
> > Out of tree modules without the goal of being submitted are not a good
> > idea.
>
> What a stupid comment (in general and expecially given the nature of the audit
> subsystem ). Sorry.
>
> Also, there are probably at present no intree users of audit other than
> compiled built-in. I'm guessing by your patch you believe built-in to be the
> only valid configuration mode for said users :-)
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, sure.
>...
I don't have a fixed opinion about whether future in-kernel users of the
audit subsystem could be modules.
Currently there are none, and if modular users get added at some point
in the future re-exporting them will be trivial.
Until then, removing the exports simply makes the kernel image a bit
smaller.
> Tony
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-21 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-20 21:05 [RFC: 2.6 patch] kernel/audit.c: remove unused exports Adrian Bunk
2006-04-20 21:25 ` Tony Jones
2006-04-21 9:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-21 13:10 ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-21 13:12 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-21 17:24 ` Tony Jones
2006-04-21 18:12 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-04-20 22:44 ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-20 22:48 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060421181243.GH19754@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=tonyj@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox