From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] execve argument logging
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:22:35 -0400
Message-ID: <20060421202235.GG1727@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <20060421113326.GA27648@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
	<200604210920.10253.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<200604212019.k3LKJ9jr015983@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200604212019.k3LKJ9jr015983@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 04:19:09PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> Maybe a "first 32/64 bytes of each argument" limit is needed?  Or is there one
> there and I missed it?

You do realize that it makes e.g. any pathname arguments in effect not
logged at all - just slap 64 '/' in front of absolute pathname and you
are done.