From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPC_SET_PERM cleanup Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:21:21 -0400 Message-ID: <200605091121.21457.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <445BB351.2040303@hp.com> <200605091105.38233.sgrubb@redhat.com> <4460B173.1030206@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4460B173.1030206@hp.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Linda Knippers Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:12, Linda Knippers wrote: > How it is easier/better? Much easier for the user. For example, the user might be searching for uid. Should the user have to specify new_uid ? Would they also need to search for old_uid? Would they have to know all the possible variations on uid? > I thought we had a discussion in the LSPP call and on the list about > spaces vs. underscores? We had this discussion on the audit list back in March while discussing the Audit Parsing Library. https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2006-March/msg00186.html I thought it was settled at that time. If this was brought up on the LSPP telecon I missed it. -Steve