From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: Watch Performance Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:32:40 -0400 Message-ID: <200605101132.40445.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <200604081221.58080.sgrubb@redhat.com> <20060411161141.GA16506@zk3.dec.com> <200604111701.23649.sgrubb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200604111701.23649.sgrubb@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: redhat-lspp-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: redhat-lspp-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com Cc: redhat-lspp@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Tuesday 11 April 2006 17:01, Steve Grubb wrote: > OK, I re-worked auditctl to use these syscalls instead of "all". I then > re-ran the tests on the same kernel as I was testing on since lspp.17 h= as > slab debug stuff turned on again. > > rules =A0seconds =A0 =A0loss > 0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A050 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00% > 10 =A0 =A0 =A052 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A04% > 25 =A0 =A0 =A056 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A012% > 50 =A0 =A0 =A069 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A038% > 75 =A0 =A0 =A081 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A062% > 90 =A0 =A0 =A087 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A074% I re-ran the analysis with the lspp.24 kernel. This is the results: rules seconds loss 0 57.4 0.0% 10 57.8 0.7% 25 56.7 +1.2% 50 58.6 2.1% 75 59.7 4.0% 90 59.1 3.0% The results look good for this test case. Thanks to everyone that helped = solve=20 this problem! Good job. -Steve -- redhat-lspp mailing list redhat-lspp@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp