From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Watch Performance
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:51:08 -0400
Message-ID: <200605101551.08111.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <200604081221.58080.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<200605101523.02772.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<20060510193729.GU29125@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060510193729.GU29125@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>
Cc: redhat-lspp@redhat.com, linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wednesday 10 May 2006 15:37, Alexander Viro wrote:
> That's very odd. =A0I can at least understand where spinlock crap might
> appear, but nearly doubled amount of do_path_lookup()? =A0That's the
> case when no watches are set, right?

Right. No watches or syscall rules.

-Steve