From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Watch Performance
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:37:29 -0400
Message-ID: <20060510193729.GU29125@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <200604081221.58080.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<200605101132.40445.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<20060510163441.GT29125@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
	<200605101523.02772.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200605101523.02772.sgrubb@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: redhat-lspp@redhat.com, linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:23:02PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> I think do_path_lookup & _raw_spin_lock jump out as the biggest changes.

That's very odd.  I can at least understand where spinlock crap might
appear, but nearly doubled amount of do_path_lookup()?  That's the
case when no watches are set, right?