From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: audit 1.2.2 released Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:25:35 -0400 Message-ID: <200605170625.36110.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <200605121726.32952.sgrubb@redhat.com> <200605161749.48754.sgrubb@redhat.com> <200605162231.k4GMVhmB005613@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200605162231.k4GMVhmB005613@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Linux Audit List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Tuesday 16 May 2006 18:31, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > One has to wonder if the audit.h used in userspace corresponds to the > kernel's view of the world. =C2=A0Is that being picked up from a privat= e .h in > the audit RPM, or is it getting it from the version in glibc-kernheader= s > RPM? =C2=A0If the latter, and there's an API change, we'll be dependent= on the > version of glibc-kernheaders present at RPM build/compile time.... Simple answer...I carry any ABI changes in libaudit.h whenever they are n= ot in=20 glibc-kernheaders. -Steve