From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: auditctl usage for filter lists: "user" , "watch" and "exclude" Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:16:20 -0400 Message-ID: <200605181216.20424.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <446C8915.20606@us.ibm.com> <200605181158.43975.sgrubb@redhat.com> <446C9B15.1030306@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <446C9B15.1030306@us.ibm.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Michael C Thompson Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Thursday 18 May 2006 12:04, Michael C Thompson wrote: > So then it should be safe to say that having two -F msgtype=... is an > invalid construct for a rule? Since messages have only 1 type? Only if they are using the '=' operator. Other operators might be valid to have multiple -F msgtype. -Steve