From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: Double addition of rule yields two log messages Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:01:37 -0400 Message-ID: <200605191501.38031.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <446DE295.8040503@us.ibm.com> <200605191429.18451.sgrubb@redhat.com> <446E12D1.2060709@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <446E12D1.2060709@hp.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Linda Knippers Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Friday 19 May 2006 14:47, Linda Knippers wrote: > But why does ausearch care? Ausearch doesn't care about this particular setting. Its looking at the config to find the log files. The parser is what cares and it is what emitted this warning. As such, you can use ausearch to make sure your config is sane before sending sighup to reconfigure the audit daemon. > Seems like if anything cared it would be the auditd but I can't find an > error or warning from it anywhere. Should be in the syslog. -Steve