From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: path filter keyword and relational operators
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:41:31 -0400
Message-ID: <200605301541.31231.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <447C9A9F.1020604@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <447C9A9F.1020604@us.ibm.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Tuesday 30 May 2006 15:18, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> Should the path filter keyword accept any relational operator other tha=
n
> =A0 =A0equals (=3D) ?=20

Its not likely to make sense with anything other than '=3D'. I still cons=
ider=20
that area a 'work in progress' and have not attempted to constrain it. I=20
expect the normal interface to be the -w option and not the -F option.

-Steve