From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: What is expected: exclude action on the never list?
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 17:12:50 -0400
Message-ID: <200605301712.50107.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <447CAEE6.1030501@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <447CAEE6.1030501@us.ibm.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Tuesday 30 May 2006 16:45, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> I would read the second rule as saying "do not exclude messages of type
> SYSCALL". Is this a correct interpretation of the rule?

That sounds reasonable, but I don't think that's what the kernel does. Maybe 
it should be corrected. I think its a 1 or 2 liner.

-Steve