From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: Dispatching of events Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:52:10 -0400 Message-ID: <200606140852.10171.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <44900409.4040008@ornl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from vpn83-173.boston.redhat.com (vpn83-173.boston.redhat.com [172.16.83.173]) by mail.boston.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5ECpllQ023703 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:51:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44900409.4040008@ornl.gov> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Wednesday 14 June 2006 08:41, Steve wrote: > So, is there a way to tell when all messages for a particular event have > been dispatched? This was recently discussed on the list. All the records for the same event come out one after another. There is a chance that some other event may sneak in during the dump. But you can pretty well assume that if there are no more records emitted with the same serial number/time stamp within 2-3 seconds, you have a complete event. > Also, is it safe to assume a type 1300 message is always the first > message pertaining to a rule violation? Maybe not. I'd not make that assumption just to be safe. Collect the full event's information, then look at the message types. -Steve