From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amy Griffis Subject: Re: Logging failed open() calls on /var/log/audit/audit.log Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:32:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20060627213257.GA11751@zk3.dec.com> References: <20060627211553.GA11601@zk3.dec.com> <200606271721.05626.sgrubb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200606271721.05626.sgrubb@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Steve Grubb Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com Steve Grubb wrote: [Tue Jun 27 2006, 05:21:05PM EDT] > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 17:15, Amy Griffis wrote: > > If you would like to see a record in this case, you must add a watch > > for /var/log/audit. > > I don't see a record watching this either. Hmmm, you're right. In this implementation, a directory lookup isn't considered an access of the object, but a directory listing is.