From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] name_count array overrun
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:56:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200609240856.57610.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060907204322.GA12003@fc.hp.com>
On Thursday 07 September 2006 16:43, Amy Griffis wrote:
> Did you consider just dropping any data encountered after we've filled
> AUDIT_NAMES, instead of copying over the data for the last element?
OK, corrected patch follows.
The below patch closes an unbounded use of name_count. This can lead to oopses
in some new file systems.
Signed-off-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
diff -urp linux-2.6.18.x86_64.orig/kernel/auditsc.c
linux-2.6.18.x86_64/kernel/auditsc.c
--- linux-2.6.18.x86_64.orig/kernel/auditsc.c 2006-09-24
08:24:27.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.18.x86_64/kernel/auditsc.c 2006-09-24 08:42:01.000000000 -0400
@@ -1347,7 +1347,13 @@ void __audit_inode_child(const char *dna
}
update_context:
- idx = context->name_count++;
+ idx = context->name_count;
+ if (context->name_count == AUDIT_NAMES) {
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "name_count maxed and losing %s\n",
+ found_name ?: "(null)");
+ return;
+ }
+ context->name_count++;
#if AUDIT_DEBUG
context->ino_count++;
#endif
@@ -1365,7 +1371,18 @@ update_context:
/* A parent was not found in audit_names, so copy the inode data for the
* provided parent. */
if (!found_name) {
- idx = context->name_count++;
+ idx = context->name_count;
+ if (context->name_count == AUDIT_NAMES) {
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG
+ "name_count maxed and losing parent inode data: dev=%02x:%02x rdev=%02x:
%02x, inode=%lu",
+ MAJOR(parent->i_sb->s_dev),
+ MINOR(parent->i_sb->s_dev),
+ MAJOR(parent->i_rdev),
+ MINOR(parent->i_rdev),
+ parent->i_ino);
+ return;
+ }
+ context->name_count++;
#if AUDIT_DEBUG
context->ino_count++;
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-24 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-07 18:00 [PATCH] name_count array overrun Steve Grubb
2006-09-07 20:43 ` Amy Griffis
2006-09-07 20:53 ` Steve Grubb
2006-09-24 12:56 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2006-09-27 21:04 ` Amy Griffis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-28 18:31 Steve Grubb
2006-09-29 12:46 ` Alexander Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200609240856.57610.sgrubb@redhat.com \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox