From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Jones Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/audit.c: remove unused exports Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:42:04 -0800 Message-ID: <20061129074204.GA29228@suse.de> References: <20061128012848.GW15364@stusta.de> <20061128191809.GA19990@suse.de> <20061129030441.GC15364@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAT7i8Jc013631 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:44:08 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de (ns2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAT7i6xq009879 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:44:07 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061129030441.GC15364@stusta.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:04:41AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I recall the opinion at the time was that it was considered useful to allow > > "it was considered" = "you were the one person who said this" Actually I believe Steve Grubb also said it so the above is factually incorrect :) > > third party modules to generate audit messages. Has anything changed? > > Why are these third party modules you are talking about not yet merged > into the kernel and when will they be submitted for inclusion? We're talking about basic logging functionality here. I know you love to swing the cleanup hammer but ....... you get the idea. Tony