From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Audit config for NISPOM req's
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:25:46 -0500
Message-ID: <200612221125.46619.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <FC11D747323EB24493CDC753367EEB929E5815@aplesnation.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <FC11D747323EB24493CDC753367EEB929E5815@aplesnation.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: "Wieprecht, Karen M." <Karen.Wieprecht@jhuapl.edu>
Cc: "Curtas, Anthony R." <ANTHONY.R.CURTAS@saic.com>, linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Friday 22 December 2006 11:22, Wieprecht, Karen M. wrote:
> So you still need a watch on the file in order to collect get audit events
> to be generated in the event of file access failures, is that correct?

That entirely depends on the rule. If you are using possible, yes. If your 
rules are always/never or a watch then you should be ok.

-Steve