From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit config lockdown
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:05:52 -0500
Message-ID: <200701270805.52578.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <200701191439.55315.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<20070127081307.GA360@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070127081307.GA360@suse.de>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Saturday 27 January 2007 03:13, Steve Beattie wrote:
> > This patch also adds "res=" to a number of configuration commands that
> > did not have it before.
>
> The res= idiom is unfamiliar to me, seems like an is_xxx name
> (is_allowed?) would make it clear what the intent is for.

"res" is an abbreviation for results. We have to know the outcome of the 
command - was it successful or not.

-Steve