From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with -F exit!=-2 on x86_64
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:06:37 -0500
Message-ID: <200702191706.37118.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1171921560.3592.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1171921560.3592.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Monday 19 February 2007 16:46, Matthew Booth wrote:
> I tried the following on both i386 and x86_64:
>
> auditctl -a exit,always -S open -F exit!=-2
>
> This works exactly as expected on i386, but not on x86_64. The effect on
> x86_64 is as if no filtering had been applied. However the following,
> for eg, works fine:

Its a kernel bug. bz 196233 Its scheduled to be in RHEL4U5.

-Steve