From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] audit: fix oops removing watch if audit disabled Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:16:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20070623191609.GX21478@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20070620223820.GA16416@suse.de> <20070623095153.279c1194.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [10.255.15.25]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5NJGC6G022101 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:16:12 -0400 Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [195.92.253.2]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5NJGAMX025746 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:16:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070623095153.279c1194.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 09:51:53AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > This looks like 2.6.22 material to me. > > Question is: is it also 2.6.21.x material? Yes, it is.