From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Should open syscall records occur without a path record?
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:00:21 -0400
Message-ID: <200707231500.21392.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <ogtr6mzz2pp.fsf@oolong.mitre.org>
	<200707230951.46896.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<ogt1wez2bzu.fsf@oolong.mitre.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <ogt1wez2bzu.fsf@oolong.mitre.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Monday 23 July 2007 14:47:33 John D. Ramsdell wrote:
> A PATH record gets ignored when another syscall event record occurs between
> the SYSCALL record and the PATH record.

OK good. That is a known problem (bz 235398) that should be worked on right 
after we get the improved dispatcher finished. 

-Steve