From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: init and its direct children not audited?
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:18:40 -0400
Message-ID: <200708151718.40864.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1187189481.7705.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1187189481.7705.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wednesday 15 August 2007 10:51:21 Matthew Booth wrote:
> Does this ring any bells?

Yes.

> Is there some other method of process creation I'm not aware of? Is init
> intentionally not audited, and if so, how do I audit it?

You must have the audit=1 boot parameter to audit any process that is created 
before auditd runs. This is in the man page under NOTES.

-Steve