From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Viro Subject: Re: OBJ_PID records Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:21:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20070928032157.GI21685@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <200709211506.56322.sgrubb@redhat.com> <1190918445.3591.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200709271449.10108.sgrubb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200709271449.10108.sgrubb@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Steve Grubb Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:49:09PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Thursday 27 September 2007 14:40:45 Eric Paris wrote: > > Interestingly on this machine the opid has ALWAYS been 1956 with > > obj=syslogd_t. ??I don't however think there is anything special about > > syslog though as that wasn't the obj in the messages sgrubb was getting, > > although i do wonder if it was the same opid every time..... > > Seems like it. I have one example where I have 86 records in a row with the > same opid. > > -Steve > > ---- > type=OBJ_PID msg=audit(09/20/2007 15:29:16.355:12775) : opid=2287 > obj=system_u:system_r:xdm_xserver_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 Er... And what has pid 2287 on that box?