linux-audit.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:23:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071101172324.GA3938@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711011033.53265.sgrubb@redhat.com>

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 10:33:52AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Monday 29 October 2007 07:15:30 pm Tony Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:04:31PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > So when audit is re-enabled, how do you make that task auditable?
> >
> > No idea. How do you do it currently? HINT: current->audit_context == NULL
> > for these tasks.  If !audit_enabled, then audit_alloc() is not going to
> > allocate an audit_context for the task.
> 
> We are looking into this - at one time it did. Someone should follow up with 
> a path correcting this soon. But I doubt the audit system will work correctly 
> if the flag gets removed as there is no good way to add it again later.

So on the syscall path you're now going to something like (pseudocode):
if (unlikely(current->audit_context)) {audit_syscall_entry()} 
else if (audit_enabled) {audit_alloc(); audit_syscall_entry()}

I agree, if this is what you want to do, then clearing the thread flag would
be a bad idea.  I'd assumed the current behaviour was by design as allocating
contexts at syscall time doesn't seem a great idea but if you need the 
functionality, you need the functionality.

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-01 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-26 20:42 [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children Tony Jones
2007-10-26 22:42 ` Chris Wright
2007-10-27 14:21 ` Steve Grubb
2007-10-29 17:20   ` Tony Jones
2007-10-29 22:04     ` Steve Grubb
2007-10-29 23:15       ` Tony Jones
2007-11-01 14:33         ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-01 17:23           ` Tony Jones [this message]
2007-11-01 18:34             ` Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071101172324.GA3938@suse.de \
    --to=tonyj@suse.de \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).