From: Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:23:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071101172324.GA3938@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711011033.53265.sgrubb@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 10:33:52AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Monday 29 October 2007 07:15:30 pm Tony Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:04:31PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > So when audit is re-enabled, how do you make that task auditable?
> >
> > No idea. How do you do it currently? HINT: current->audit_context == NULL
> > for these tasks. If !audit_enabled, then audit_alloc() is not going to
> > allocate an audit_context for the task.
>
> We are looking into this - at one time it did. Someone should follow up with
> a path correcting this soon. But I doubt the audit system will work correctly
> if the flag gets removed as there is no good way to add it again later.
So on the syscall path you're now going to something like (pseudocode):
if (unlikely(current->audit_context)) {audit_syscall_entry()}
else if (audit_enabled) {audit_alloc(); audit_syscall_entry()}
I agree, if this is what you want to do, then clearing the thread flag would
be a bad idea. I'd assumed the current behaviour was by design as allocating
contexts at syscall time doesn't seem a great idea but if you need the
functionality, you need the functionality.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-01 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-26 20:42 [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children Tony Jones
2007-10-26 22:42 ` Chris Wright
2007-10-27 14:21 ` Steve Grubb
2007-10-29 17:20 ` Tony Jones
2007-10-29 22:04 ` Steve Grubb
2007-10-29 23:15 ` Tony Jones
2007-11-01 14:33 ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-01 17:23 ` Tony Jones [this message]
2007-11-01 18:34 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071101172324.GA3938@suse.de \
--to=tonyj@suse.de \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).