From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Audit issue
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:32:18 -0500
Message-ID: <20071108143218.GB28304@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <200710301248.24261.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<200710311740.19981.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<20071108141926.GA28304@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
	<200711080927.14472.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200711080927.14472.sgrubb@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:27:13AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday 08 November 2007 09:19:26 Alexander Viro wrote:
> > Have fun...
> 
> Thanks for posting this patch. Is it impossible to "repair " processes by 
> simply adding a context if the pointer is NULL?

At which point would you do that?  I'd rather not try to play with locking,
etc., when we set audit_enabled to non-zero...  Especially when there's
a trivially non-intrusive patch.