From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Audit: EINTR instead of kernel private return codes in
	audit records
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:17:58 -0500
Message-ID: <200711141618.00090.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1195071728.2924.40.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<200711141530.56256.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<1195074462.2924.46.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1195074462.2924.46.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, pmoore@hp.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wednesday 14 November 2007 16:07:42 Eric Paris wrote:
> It should be slightly faster <snip>
>
> We would also be picking up ENOIOCTLCMD but that shoudln't be seen on
> this code path, so I guess it doesn't matter.

Right, the note in the top of include/linux/errno.h says these should not be 
seen by userspace. So, ENOIOCTLCMD is invalid if we ever saw it. But what 
about the NFSv3 errnos (in the same file)? Do we need to worry about those?

Thanks,
-Steve