From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Audit: EINTR instead of kernel private return codes in
	audit records
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:58:16 -0500
Message-ID: <200711180558.16921.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1195071728.2924.40.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<200711141618.00090.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<1195351113.2924.120.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1195351113.2924.120.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, pmoore@hp.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Saturday 17 November 2007 08:58:33 pm Eric Paris wrote:
> It would be absolutely wrong for the audit system to translate
> even ENOIOCTLCMD to anything else if this is what was actually returned
> to the process.

The point is, none of the errnos in that file should *ever* go to user space. 
glibc has no translation (strerror()) for them because they are internal to 
the kernel. So, they need to get translated to something. My only question is 
would these extra ones ever get picked up in this code path?

-Steve