From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Subject: Re: RFC4303 (IPsec/ESP) auditing requirements
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:46:13 -0500
Message-ID: <200712051546.13686.paul.moore@hp.com>
References: <200712051445.13051.paul.moore@hp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200712051445.13051.paul.moore@hp.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Joy Latten <latten@us.ibm.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wednesday 05 December 2007 2:45:12 pm Paul Moore wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm looking at RFC4303 at some of the auditing requirements and one of the
> gaps between what the specification requires and what we currently provide
> involves the SA's sequence number and the IPv6 flow ID.  According the list
> of existing audit fields[1] there doesn't appear to any fields which are a
> good match.  With that in mind I'd like to propose two new fields:
>
>  * seqno - sequence number
>  * flowid - flow id

Scratch the 'flowid' name, the more I look at things we should probably go 
with 'flowlbl'.

> Any comments, objections, suggestions?
>
> [1] http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/audit-parse.txt

-- 
paul moore
linux security @ hp