From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Audit: use == not = in if statements
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:54:47 -0500
Message-ID: <20080218235446.GG1473@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <1203376996.2928.50.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1203376996.2928.50.camel@localhost.localdomain>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 06:23:16PM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> Clearly this was supposed to be an == not an = in the if statement.
> This patch also causes us to stop processing execve args once we have
> failed rather than continuing to loop on failure over and over and over.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>

ACK.