From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -v2] Smack: Integrate with Audit Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:55:51 -0400 Message-ID: <200803130955.53263.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <20080310182634.GA448@ubuntu> <20080312024446.GA5820@ubuntu> <1205326375.23866.215.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1205326375.23866.215.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com Cc: James Morris , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , LKML , LSM-ML , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Wednesday 12 March 2008 08:52:55 am Stephen Smalley wrote: > Only question I have is whether audit folks are ok with reuse of the > flags in this manner I am not going to have time to look at this until next week. I don't know how much help I can be since I don't actually have a system that would be running this new MAC framework. So, the less the audit system changes, the more likely it is to be OK. Lots of wild changes I can't see or test is bad. -Steve