From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: audit rule question Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 12:44:01 -0400 Message-ID: <200805071244.02163.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <1210176961.6586.26.camel@homeserver> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.boston.redhat.com (mail.boston.redhat.com [10.16.255.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m47GiBCx015645 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 12:44:11 -0400 Received: from [10.11.15.42] (vpn-15-42.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.15.42]) by mail.boston.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m47GiA8e005850 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 12:44:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1210176961.6586.26.camel@homeserver> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Wednesday 07 May 2008 12:16:01 LC Bruzenak wrote: > Am I misunderstanding this option, or is there a manpage or code error? > audit-1.7.2-6.fc9.x86_64 I'd say we need to fix the man page. -Steve