From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: audit rule question
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 14:37:13 -0400
Message-ID: <200805071437.13865.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <1210176961.6586.26.camel@homeserver>
	<200805071244.02163.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<1210179397.6586.44.camel@homeserver>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1210179397.6586.44.camel@homeserver>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wednesday 07 May 2008 12:56:37 LC Bruzenak wrote:
> > I'd say we need to fix the man page.
>
> OK. Should I open a bz?

I put it in the TODO list for 1.7.3. So, it is being tracked. You can open a 
bz if you want to.


> I am a little surprised that the "-a always,exit" doesn't cause an
> error. I wonder if it works correctly - maybe auditctl code is smart
> enough to overcome syntactic dyslexia? :)

I was always mixing up the order when writing rules, so I fixed auditctl to 
take it in either order. Its been like this for 3-4 years.

-Steve