Re: open() syscall and success=0 question

[Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>]

On Tuesday 13 May 2008 10:13:53 Keith Kaple wrote:
> When open fails, the open() manpage says it will return -1 so that will make
> success false or 0.  When success is false, auditd seems to use the negated
> value of ERRNO to populate the exit= field, is that correct?

This is actually done by the kernel, not auditd. But you are correct.

> So a rule such as:
>
> auditctl -a exit,always -S open -F success=0 -F exit=-13
>
> Would log only permission related failures, correct?

Correct. But that can be reduced to:

auditctl -a exit,always -S open -F exit=-EPERM

Syscall rules affect every single syscall made by every program. So, you want 
the rule to be efficient. In this case, checking the success field is 
redundant.

-Steve