From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: audit 1.7.4 released
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:10:03 -0400
Message-ID: <200805271210.04007.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <200805191450.06153.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<1211903431.6568.41.camel@homeserver>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1211903431.6568.41.camel@homeserver>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Tuesday 27 May 2008 11:50:31 LC Bruzenak wrote:
> Is the host "0.0.0.0" field here a bug?

No, Eric's explanation sounds right.

> Once we aggregate these would be tough to separate.

That is why we added the node field. :)  You should probably enable it with 
the name_format option.

-Steve