From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: ausearch / policy question Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:12:16 -0400 Message-ID: <200807241512.16836.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <1216852245.7093.116.camel@homeserver> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.boston.redhat.com (mail.boston.redhat.com [10.16.255.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6OJTUHQ019170 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:29:30 -0400 Received: from vpn-13-43.rdu.redhat.com (vpn-13-43.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.13.43]) by mail.boston.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6OJCIZu031998 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:12:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1216852245.7093.116.camel@homeserver> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Wednesday 23 July 2008 18:30:45 LC Bruzenak wrote: > So my questions are: > 1: duplicate records above - expected or correct since there were two > matches - the AVC and also the command? you'd have to look at the logs to figure that out. ausearch doesn't buffer events past one miscompare. > 2: why is ausearch producing the AVCs? Maybe you need to be secadmin or auditadmin? -Steve