From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the bug of using AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT when set
	fail, no error output.
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:04:38 +0100
Message-ID: <20080731160438.GK28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <48911F47.50606@cn.fujitsu.com> <1217474150.2902.76.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1756970AbYGaQEz@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1217474150.2902.76.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: zhangxiliang <zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com>, sgrubb@redhat.com, Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:15:50PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 10:11 +0800, zhangxiliang wrote:
> > When the "status_get->mask" is "AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT || AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_LIMIT".
> > If "audit_set_rate_limit" fails and "audit_set_backlog_limit" succeeds, the "err" value will be greater than or equal to 0. It will miss the failure of rate set. 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> man, it gives me the heebee jeebies with the coding style but it follows
> everything else

Sanitized, applied, pushed to audit-current (audit.b53)