From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add the field checking for missing value after
	opration
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:19:11 -0400
Message-ID: <200808061519.12007.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <48995CFA.5020302@cn.fujitsu.com> <489964E3.40702@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <489964E3.40702@cn.fujitsu.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wednesday 06 August 2008 04:46:27 Zhang Xiliang wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> >  	if (v == NULL || f == v)
> >  		return -1;
>
> I have some questions for "f == v".
>
> I think it only checks the address of "f" and "v".

Yes, this was in attempt to make sure that they didn't type -F =10. In that 
case v will equal f because they start at the same address.

-Steve